Compare

GroundControl vs InspectionXpert: which one for FAI?

Q: Which is better for FAI, GroundControl or InspectionXpert?

Choose GroundControl if you need cloud deployment, ITAR GovCloud hosting, or FAI workflows across multiple suppliers with reviewer approval. Choose InspectionXpert, now sold as Ideagen Quality Control, if you want the long-standing template-driven ballooning tool, especially inside an existing Ideagen stack. Both auto-balloon and auto-populate AS9102 forms; with both, interpreting general note tolerances, fit classes, and flag notes remains the engineer's job.

Two established ballooning tools, one honest answer, and the question neither pricing page mentions.

By Atishay Jain, founder of Mavlon · Updated July 2026

Full disclosure: we build Mavlon, which competes with the tools reviewed here. Every claim comes from public documentation as of mid 2026. Spot an error? atishay@mavlon.co

The short answer: choose GroundControl if you need cloud deployment, ITAR GovCloud hosting, or FAI running across multiple suppliers with approval workflows. Choose InspectionXpert (now sold as Ideagen Quality Control) if you want the long-standing template-driven ballooning tool, especially if you already run Ideagen products. With both, the engineer still interprets general note tolerances, fit classes, and flag notes by hand; if that is the bottleneck you are trying to remove, look at the wider field.

Mavlon is a third tool in this market, so we have an interest here. We wrote this comparison anyway because people ask it constantly and the vendors do not answer it side by side. Every claim below comes from public documentation as of mid 2026.

Side by side

The comparison

Criterion	GroundControl	InspectionXpert (Ideagen QC)	Mavlon
Deployment	Cloud, AWS GovCloud, US data residency	Desktop, with cloud options	Cloud, any browser
Ballooning	AI auto-balloon tuned for manufacturing drawings	Smart Extract auto-balloon, template gallery	AI reads the full drawing, around 90 percent, rest flagged
Tolerance interpretation	Detection-first; engineer applies notes and fits	Detection-first; engineer applies notes and fits	General notes applied by size, fit classes expanded, flag notes mapped
AS9102 output	Forms 1 to 3, Net-Inspect and customer template export	AS9102 FAI and PPAP report templates	Form 3 pre-filled; AS9102, Net-Inspect, PPAP dimensional export
CMM import	Any CMM via CSV and Excel	Measurement import supported	Results map back onto the Form 3
Compliance posture	ITAR-registered, NIST 800-171, GovCloud	Standard corporate hosting	Standard secure cloud
Multi-supplier workflows	Reviewer roles, approvals across suppliers	Single-team reporting focus	Core FAI, plugs into your workflow tool
Time to first result	Platform onboarding	Desktop install and setup	First drawing in about 5 minutes, free

Vendor columns reflect public documentation as of mid 2026. Corrections: atishay@mavlon.co.

The decision factors

How to actually choose

Deployment and IT. This is the cleanest split. GroundControl is browser-based; InspectionXpert grew up as desktop software and still lives closest to the workstation. If your quality team works across sites, or you do not want per-machine installs, that alone decides it.

ITAR and defense work. GroundControl is ITAR-registered and runs in AWS GovCloud with US-only data residency. If your contracts require that posture, InspectionXpert does not market an equivalent, and this comparison is over.

Templates and reporting habits. InspectionXpert earned its user base on templates: AS9102, PPAP, and custom customer formats from a large gallery. If your quality system is built around specific report formats and you already run Ideagen products, staying in that family is a fair choice.

Scale of the FAI operation. Running FAIRs across many suppliers with review and approval chains is GroundControl's home turf. A single quality engineer ballooning their own shop's drawings will not use most of that machinery.

What neither column changes

The reading is still yours

Both tools make the marking faster: they find dimensions, place balloons, and populate forms. Read their documentation closely and you will notice what stays with the engineer: applying the ISO 2768 general note to 47 untoleranced dimensions by size range, expanding 9 H7 to 9.000 to 9.015, chasing flag note 6 across two sheets. That interpretation work is where FAI afternoons actually go.

Mavlon starts where both of these tools stop. It reads the drawing like a senior quality engineer, applies the general note tolerances by size, expands the fit classes, maps the flag notes, and hands you a Form 3 to verify instead of build, in 2 to 3 minutes. Some shops run it alongside GroundControl or InspectionXpert; some run it alone. The first drawing is free, so the cheapest way to settle this page is to try it on yours.

Or skip the ballooning debate entirely.

Upload the drawing you are evaluating these tools with. See what comes back before you sit through either demo.

Try with One Drawing

First drawing is free. No signup. No salesperson.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for FAI, GroundControl or InspectionXpert?

GroundControl for cloud, ITAR GovCloud, and multi-supplier approval workflows. InspectionXpert (Ideagen Quality Control) for template-driven reporting, especially inside an existing Ideagen stack. Both auto-balloon and populate AS9102 forms; interpretation of notes, fits, and flags stays manual with both.

Is InspectionXpert still available?

Yes, as Ideagen Quality Control. Ideagen acquired InspectionXpert and renamed it; the ballooning workflow and template gallery continue under the new name.

Does GroundControl support ITAR programs?

GroundControl is ITAR-registered and hosted in AWS GovCloud with US-only data residency, aligned to NIST SP 800-171. That posture is its clearest differentiator here.

Do either of these tools interpret tolerances automatically?

Both publicly market detection: finding dimensions, GD&T, and notes, and populating forms. Applying general note tolerances by size, expanding fit classes, and mapping flag notes remains manual with both. Mavlon does that interpretation automatically, which is why some shops pair it with either tool.