The 2026 Buyer Guide
Ballooning software: what it does, and who actually reads the drawing.
Nine tools balloon drawings. The difference worth paying for is what happens after the balloons are placed.
If a customer sends you a drawing and expects parts made to it, you have this job. It does not matter whether the shop machines, cuts sheet metal, welds, or runs EDM: the print is the common denominator, and someone has to account for every characteristic on it. This guide compares the eight serious tools for that job in 2026. Mavlon is our product, so read the table knowing that; every claim about other tools comes from their public documentation.
One job, four dialects
The same ballooned drawing, whatever the customer calls it
Good ballooning software does the shared spine once and outputs whichever form the customer wants. Keep that in mind when a tool is marketed for only one dialect.
The short answer
Which ballooning software should you pick?
Side by side
The comparison table
| Tool | Deployment | Ballooning | Interprets tolerances? | Output formats | CMM import | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mavlon | Cloud, any browser | AI reads the full drawing in 2 to 3 min, around 90 percent, rest flagged | Yes: general notes applied by size, fit classes expanded, flag notes mapped | AS9102 Form 3, Net-Inspect, PPAP dimensional, generic first article | Yes, results map back to the form | Shops that want the reading done |
| GroundControl | Cloud, AWS GovCloud | AI auto-balloon | Detection-first | AS9102 Forms 1 to 3, Net-Inspect, customer templates | Yes, CSV and Excel from any CMM | ITAR, multi-supplier programs |
| Net-Inspect | Cloud | Auto-balloon with OCR | Detection-first | Forms 1 to 3 in-portal, e-sign | Yes | Prime-mandated submission |
| High QA | Desktop install | Auto-balloon assist | Detection-first | AS9102, PPAP | Deep CMM integration | CMM-first inspection planning |
| DISCUS | Desktop install | Smart Extract from native CAD | Detection-first | AS9102 | Yes | Model-based shops |
| 1Factory | Cloud | 1-Click Auto Balloon | Tables loaded, engineer picks class | AS9102, revision diff | Yes | Quality platform beyond ballooning |
| Ideagen Quality Control | Desktop, cloud options | Smart Extract auto-balloon | Detection-first | AS9102, PPAP templates | Measurement import | Template-driven reporting |
| SolidWorks Inspection | Desktop; SOLIDWORKS add-in + PDF standalone | OCR auto-balloon | Detection-first | AS9102, PPAP, ISO 13485 templates | Professional tier | Shops that design in SOLIDWORKS |
| Balloonist | Browser, client-side | Auto-balloon plus box-select | Automatic detection marketed, lighter interpretation | AS9102 Rev C Excel, CSV | CSV | Occasional, lightweight use |
Competitor rows reflect public documentation as of mid 2026. Spotted something out of date? atishay@mavlon.co.
The 10 percent problem
Where auto-ballooning actually loses you time
Every vendor markets a detection rate around 85 to 90 percent. The number that matters is not the rate; it is where the misses concentrate, because the misses are exactly the characteristics that take longest by hand:
This is the honest line between the categories. Ballooning software makes the marking fast and leaves the thinking to you. Mavlon does the thinking part too, then shows you exactly which of its readings to double-check. That is the difference between correcting an extraction and verifying an interpretation.
Balloon your next drawing without doing the reading.
Upload one drawing. In a couple of minutes you will know more about these tools than any comparison table can tell you.
Try with One DrawingFirst drawing is free. No signup. No salesperson.